SGA debates controversy of senatorial overreach in the judicial nomination process
Reporting about the SGA, not a record of it: The Johns Hopkins News-Letter published this and the SGA did not write it, file it, or approve it. The archive holds it because the article itself uses the phrases “sga” and “student government”.
Summary
- This Johns Hopkins News-Letter article covers an SGA meeting about judicial nominations and three proposed bills.
- The News-Letter reported that the SGA held its Nov. 29 weekly general body meeting to discuss judiciary nominations, the Beta X SGA: Reindeer Games Bill, the SGA Communications and Marketing Committee Funding Bill and the SGA x Mindfulness Event Funding Bill.
- The paper reported that four of five student justices graduated last spring and that no nominees had been presented in six months; it also said Ryan Chou’s motion to discuss the nominations in a moderated caucus passed unanimously.
- The article says Rachel Huang presented a bill for a reading-week mental health event with refreshments, calming music and journaling prompts, with costs jointly covered by the SGA and JHU Health Promotion and Well-Being.
- The reporter writes that Dobbs presented a philanthropy event bill whose prize proceeds would go to Black Women Build Baltimore, while Milton Diaz requested $172 for SGA Communications and Marketing Committee materials and a Canva Pro subscription.